{Historical Circles (3) [continued (7)]}[12th September 1989]

[Redbook6:246][19890912:1140m]{Historical Circles (3) [continued (7)]}[12th September 1989]

.1140

[continued]

- - - -

The Islamic[,] and post-Christian* Judaic[,] cycles shown here** are highly conjectural, because I do not know enough yet about the history of either to offer much. I cannot really tie in the tragic R~-type ending of the Judaic cycle *** with its apparently r-type beginning (concentrating on culture after the collapse of their independent politics) – or are there 2 x 1,000 year cycles, I[nner] C[ircle] → O[uter] C[ircle], within the 2,000 year O[uter] C[ircle]?

For Islam, which I see as a legalistic religion, a 2,000 year cycle is suggested; its present position at G~ is marked, after a period of inferiority and subjugation, by a greater danger of almost inevitable revolutionary change, outside its control. Present fundamentalism is therefore not so much a sign of the times as a mark of the type of movement, and of [the type of] circle.****

Christian fundamentalism, on the other hand, coming at the end of a cycle which has been far more authoritarian than it should have been, is more dangerous because it could carry Christianity over onto another outer circle. We have a unique opportunity to change to a predominantly inner-circle period, through the Love of Christ.

*[Presumably after the beginning of Christianity]

**[See last previous entry but two [Redbook6:244][19890912:1140k]{Historical Circles (3) [continued (4)]}[12th September 1989],ff]

***Or are 2 rebellions S-type?

****And is it part of the C[ommon] E[ra] cycle? (see VII.[]….) <900913>

#Interestingly, the end of the conjectural Islamic cycle would coincide with g~ (or M~) on a new Christian 2,000-year cycle (and the end of the current political Europe cycle).

(– as the present Islamic cycle started on the M~/g~ (g~ = Gabriel) of the present Christian cycle.) <890913>

[continues]

[PostedBlogger20042020]