Tuesday 26 November 2019

{Pascal’s Church}[13th July 1989]


[Redbook6:152][19890713:1847i]{Pascal’s Church}[13th July 1989]

19890713.1847
[continued]
*













Line count
Cumu-lative
**






0








The Spirit






1






1
1
The Creator





1

1





2
3
In orthodox terms, I suppose, the Trinity:***




1

2

1




4
7
1st 4 disciples****



1

3

3

1



8
15
Next 8 Disciples****


1

4

6

4

1


16
31


1

5

10

10

5

1

32
63
#
1

6

15

20

15

6

1
64
127














128
255

#*


*(See earlier vol [V])
ref [[Redbook6:147][19890710:1722]{Cumulative Doubling Instability}[10th July 1989],]147:

**(– Each cumulative total tending to jump to the next by adding the next line (= square), as noted on
[[Redbook6:147][19890710:1722]{Cumulative Doubling Instability}[10th July 1989],] p147

***in my view, The Trinity + the Adversary, ie adding Son & Adversary.
[<>]
In the Creation, the Trinity + the Adversary → Creation (including Evil)
In Jesus’ mission, the Trinity → the Church (excluding Evil)
CREATION







THE CHURCH
The Spirit



0



The Spirit
The Creator Father



1



The Father
The Son – The Adv[ersary]


1

1


The Spirit – The Son
4 Cardinal Archetypes

1



1

1st 4 disciples
8 Degrees
1

3

3

1
Next 8 Disciples
(The Spirit, having the number 0, & being everywhere and nowhere, can do this)
<19890717>

****This is exactly how M[ar]k and M[at]hew record their selection (Luke omits Andrew).

#(This may the mistaken basis of Luke’s 72, ie 63 – 3 (Trinity / F[ather], Son & A[dversary] = 60, +12 = 72[;] or eg 60, +12 = 72 – but ‘72 others’ (L[u]k[e] 10.1) ‘in pairs’. (or 70)
Luke’s Gospel is more of a work of art than Mark’s or Matthew’s… or maybe this was just a selection from those who had by now joined, chosen as a multiple of 12 for the 12 Tribes [of Israel]….

#*{per [[Redbook6:147][19890710:1722]{Cumulative Doubling Instability}[10th July 1989],] 147,
V. [[Redbook5:222-223][19880724:1443g]{The Sphere [continued (7)]}[24th July 1988]ff] 223, &c.}
See [[Redbook6:166][19890726:1118]{Historical Circles (1) [continued (3)]}[26th July 1989],] 166 <901110>



[continues]

[PostedBlogger26for28112019]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.