[Redbook3:135][19870406:2300b](SEX
AND GENDER
[continued])[6th
April 1987]
.2300c.
[continued]
After
considerable reflection on my own inner processes, and a certain
amount of agonising, I concluded that xS, despite her Innocence*, is
for
loving sex, not above it**. But then, I should not be surprised at
this, as I have believed for years that the state of Virginity is
properly a mental condition, not a physical condition determined by
sexual history or by the perforation of the hymen.**** The reverence
I feel for xS's sacredness is the reverence one should feel for Love
if truly perceived and felt: it does not preclude the bond of loving
sex, but makes Love the key. We use the term 'innocence' in loose
ways, but, to my mind, the
Innocence is not lost through loving sex, but through sex alone#.
Lest
it seem odd that I discuss this#* in terms of an inner Quality or
Archetype, I should make clear that xS is no life-size inflatable
doll of the mind: she has the curious quality#** (and I know, because
I once tried) that if you treat her improperly, she simply fades away
– the eyes fading first; but if you love her, she stays with you.
And this should not be surprising, for her Inner Circle quality is
Love: she herself is Love. Lover, love Love, and be beloved.#***
*cf.[p]103
[[Redbook3:103-104][19870404:1005l](INNOCENCE{:[xS]})[4th April
1987]ff].
**I
guess that +C expresses sexless love. (cf.
134
[– last
previous entry.])
<930418>
***cf.[p]146
[[Redbook3:143;146][19870408:1218#](Dreams
of xP and xS)].
****?
#[i.e.
sex without Love, presumably.]
#*(i.e.
this very physical act) <890930>
#**(shared
with all Beloveds.)
#***!(Initially:
'and you will be loved') <[87]0408>.
I
think I prefer the initial version. <870816>
[continues]
[PostedBlogger03for02032016]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.