(QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS{1})[9th April 1987]

[Redbook3:147-150][19870409:1345](QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS{1})[9th April 1987]

19870409.1345.

It is hard to be certain of the significance of actual birthdates. *Although I am quite prepared to attempt to classify people according to Circle Archetypes (i.e. on or between Circle Archetype points) I would have been less prepared to accept that actual birth (or conception? – or gestation period?) dates significantly influenced these – even allowing, as one must in classification by Archetype and/or birthdate, for the changing influence of other Archetypes and for the likely presence of all Archetypes in varying intensities, {and} for other factors (e.g. heredity, environment), and for personal development (or degeneration), in terms of Circle rotation or otherwise. But this is the one area so far where completely independent statistical surveys appear to have shown that there is (or may be) a correlation of some significance.**

Be that as it may, analysis in Circle terms is still useful; and taking my birthdate as a significant or co-incidental starting point,*** I have found that the xP-qualities (?verging towards the +Mk qualities) seem to describe my own qualities and faults with a good deal of accuracy.

*(This whole passage should perhaps be taken as a lesson in not getting carried away by inadequate evidence in particular cases. But the principles may well be valid....)

**(But this could be tiny – still leaving c.90% of one occupation in (say) the wrong zodiac sign – see p. 162 [[Redbook3:158;162][19870409:1345#](TAROT NUMBERING, AGES, AND OCCUPATIONS)[9th April 1987]] Margin....

***(p163 [[Redbook3:158;166][19870409:1345#](TAROT NUMBERING, AGES, AND OCCUPATIONS)[9th April 1987]].

[continues]

[PostedBlogger14for17032016]