[Redbook1:36][19680429:1900]{Immigration and Race Relations}[29th
April 1968][Age 16]
Monday 28h
April 1968
7.0p.m.
I have just
not eaten a very nasty supper of old fish fried in breadcrumbs (artificial)
with lumpy mashed potato. One mouthful
was enough. O.K., I know there are
thousands starving in India
who would love this food -- but that's no excuse for serving up foul on muck of
this sort. Even at 2/-a meal, I should
have thought that they could do better than that.
The rain is
sheeting down outside, I have had a bad essay handed back to me (about Grade
'O' standard at 'A' level), and I have a lot of work which I feel singularly
disinclined to do. However, I have
written a little more verse and I have, I hope, got myself out of judging [?]
the 'Babcock' Athletics Trophy, so things aren't too bad.
I am having
some difficulty in choosing my natural style of writing. On the advice of Dr. D, I have decided to
adopt this sloping style since, although it is less tidy than the upright
style, it is easier and does not slope backwards -- I am told that
backward sloping writing is a disadvantage when one is applying for a job,
since it indicates nervous disorders etc.
I am also told that large writing is an advantage, so I shall try to
adopt it. D says that upright writing
his best, but mine tends to slip backwards so I can't use that safely.
The
immigration problem is worrying me slightly.
I think the Americans' pessimism is slightly wishful thinking: they
would secretly like to see us in the same boat as them, if only for company, as
we, no doubt, would secretly like to see them in financial trouble -- not
through malice, but so that we would not feel so alone in the scornful eyes (we
imagine) of the world. We have not the
same inbred sense of superiority and scorn for the black man as the American
South has in many places; therefore, it should be an easier job to eradicate
it. The most important thing is that
schools and facilities for young people should NOT be segregated; I have a
small hope that the next generation -- my generation -- will accept black men
completely, so long as they can be indoctrinated -- yes, I'm afraid that is the
only word, to do so. But it is for this
generation's prejudices and fears that we must plan. Part of the problem is that at this
particular moment there is overcrowding and unemployment and individual and
general insecurity. Overcrowding often
encourages militancy -- it is one of man's deepest instincts, I think, to swing
his arms about and clear space for himself in overcrowded conditions. How else can he have survived by migration? -- In early times, the great migrations must,
I think, have occurred when overcrowded conditions made famine inevitable, but
before it occurred -- otherwise it would have been too late. This is why archaeologists puzzle over the
causes of the great migrations, because there are no visible signs of a catastrophe
– i.e. piles of bones -- to cause such migrations. The answer is that nature takes over before
famine strikes -- usually, but not always.
But I digress.
As I was
saying, overcrowding encourages men to fight, whether for air or for
rights. Unemployment and insecurity
desire scapegoats, and who better than men who one knows to have recently
arrived in the country, because of their colour? [“]They
are the root of the trouble. They are
the men who are taking our jobs, sleeping with our wives, marrying our children,
infiltrating [...] the most sacred aspects of our great Nation’s Way of Life....[“]
You see
what I mean by prejudice.
We must
make it absolutely illegal to incite racial hatred -- in fact, we have already
done so, but the law either isn't strict enough or isn't being enforced
enough. I'm afraid this is one area
where we really can't afford freedom of speech as we know it today. This may sound awful, but think of these
possible headlines: Race Riots in London; Birmingham burns; Looters in Edinburgh;
Troops called in in Coventry. Perhaps it is the last phrase which has the nastiest
ring; a nation which has to use its own forces against its own people is in a
sorry state indeed. We must also set up
a body (not another one!) with complete powers to regulate the number of
people coming into Britain. They may choose on the basis of intelligence,
need, or whatever -- or even on colour.
At a time like this they should allow virtually no one in. Their facts of admittance (figures) must be
made available to the public at regular, short intervals. No immigrants should be sent home, but all
who wish to should be given a free passage so long as they clearly understand
that they will not be allowed back.
Perhaps those who we want to keep should not be offered a free
passage. All this must be irrespective
of colour, we hope. The racial
discrimination laws should be enforced on blacks who lead protest (militant)
marches as well as on white employers who refuse black men jobs -- simple tests
could be made by phone -- on account of their colour.
Immigrants
should get voting rights and free services e.g. National Health Service at a
short interval after they arrive -- from one year till three years, depending
on what the privilege is -- but they must lose these privileges if they have
their fare home paid for. They can give
e.g. one year's notice that they are going to come for things like education
and national health. England must be made to look like
less of a paradise and more of a workhouse to those abroad.
Of course,
the basic problem is one you can't legislate against -- that of the basic
instinct of people to keep the stock pure.
This can be indoctrinated out, however, by modern mass media -- the
press, t.v., schools, political speeches, radio, advertisements, and the
Church. Perhaps the last would play the
most important role in giving forth Christ's attitude to colour prejudice, and
in emphasising that "Love thy Neighbour” includes black men. They should indeed say that a man who hates
his neighbour because his skin is dark has no right to call himself Christian
-- I believe this to be so.
Unfortunately, the Church feels itself to be in such a precarious
position that it probably will not risk itself in this cause -- in which case
it will have failed in its duty to God and mankind.
[PostedBlogger14092012]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.