{Multiple Viewpoints and Single Minds [continued (9)]}[12th February 1988]

[Redbook5:15-16][19880212:1155i]{Multiple Viewpoints and Single Minds [continued (9)]}[12^th February 1988]

19880212.1155

[continued]

However, the second part of the answer* is that although U~ (whose original quality on the Inner Circle was Stability/Stabilisation, later Evolution) is diametrically opposite to R~, S~ is the contra-rotational equivalent** and the culmination of the Circles dynamic (short of +C†I~). S~ is near to Fusion, and is Harmony, the co-existence of parts (as in Three-in-One and One-in-Three?),*** whereas single-mindedness represents, I suspect, the suppression of other parts. This is why single-mindedness represents specialisation, one part of Diversity (or Distraction), and not the all-embracing wholeness of Unity.

The numerical correspondence (Single-mindedness with Unity) is misleading: single-mindedness represents acute division of the whole, and specialisation in one part. Multiplicity of personality, by contrast, represents an attempt to embrace the whole (which is ultimately One): being unfused, it can give rise to acute conflict at R~. Fusion*** occurs only after Harmony at S~.

*[See last previous entry.]

**[to R~, presumably.]

***{Crikey! (See TXX-TXXI.)}

****{-- Into One, of course!}

[PostedBlogger26for30112017]