{Crisis [continued (3)]}[7th February 1988]

[Redbook5:8-9][19880207:2345d]{Crisis [continued (3)]}[7^th February 1988]

19880207.

.2345

[continued]

I should love to know in what way the secular Hebrew scholars understand “mishpat”;* but one can assume that the Greek translators,** if they were not Jews themselves (which they probably were), at least had access to Jewish Christians who knew what it meant. I should also like to know how often the word 'judgement' in our N[ew] T[estament]s translates “mishpat”/“κρισις”.***

The implications are tremendous. Christianity as we have received it is, and has been practically since the beginning, a judgement-based religion. This is one of the less satisfactory aspects to the mind of modern Man. Could it be that we have been under a misapprehension – that scholarship might reveal Christianity to be a religion, not of moral judgement but of separation, of turning points?

Although in Circles Analysis A~ is the Archangel of the Separation, I don't think it is stretching the point to say that the separating process – the Circle itself – begins and ends with +C†I~; and in the Circle eschatology, the separating of Self, Soul and Spirit in various combinations occurs with the Second Death**** at R~-+C†I~, approaching Crisis. A similar reversal is possible under different circumstances at #S~-+C†I~, also approaching Crisis.

A~ is the Archangel#* of the Separation because he keeps the furthest point of the Separation, and thus sets the conditions, static and (I think) dynamic, in which separating can occur.

*[See last previous entry but one.]

**presumably, for the N[ew] T[estament] is meant here – and what of the Septuagint? <891006>

***A[uthorised] V[ersion]: Judgement 39 times from “κρισις” per Y[oung's] C[oncordat]. <891006>

****[cf. [Redbook3:172-173][19870411:2200e](RECALL)[11th April 1987];

[Redbook4:110][19871006:1020f]{Death on the Line}[6th October 1987];

[Redbook4:111-113][19871006:1020h]{Ghosts}[6th October 1987]ff; & '[2]'.]

#[The ms. has xA here, but this use of the fictional name is presumably a mistake for S~.]

#*or Chief Agent <891006>

{cf. [2]}

[PostedBlogger19for21112017]