{The Divine Point [continued]}[16th December 1989]

 [Redbook6:361][19891216:1645b]{The Divine Point [continued]}[16th December 1989]

19891216.1645

[continued]

The * technique of continually asking questions about (or against) one’s interlocutor’s views results in the end in exposing the dependence of all rational argument on irrational assumptions: ** which might be {(almost)} designed to demonstrate (without statement) the necessity of the existence of, and foundation in, God.

*[Socratic – see last previous entry]

**(cf II?...[[Redbook2:74A][19751112:0000 a]{WHY?}[12^th November 1975],] ‘Why? Why? Why?)

[PostedBlogger09for10102020]