[Redbook4:283-284][19880103:1211d]{Communion
[continued
(3)]}[3rd
January 1988]
19880103.1211
[continued]
One's
reaction to this* must depend on one's outlook on such matters and
one's attitude to life in general. If you do not believe in
principle or archetypes such as Christ, and the possibility of their
realisation or projection within the Individual, no doubt it will
seem obvious that I have sublimated homosexual tendencies into a
delusion of a pseudo-religious nature. Were I to talk about it too
much, no doubt drugs would be prescribed: and they might well end all
this. It would not follow that the experience was not real, even
objective, merely that my mind had been blocked from access to it:
there are, after all, (I believe) drugs that can make you blind, but
the World continues. Such a view inflates sex and negates the
Spirit, distorting perception: the opinions, on this subject, of
those who have not undergone this kind of experience are unlikely to
be soundly based.
It
is possible that my reaction – to fear and reject the intimacy of
the Communion while loving and accepting the Man – is a part of the
pattern of transition from Outer to Inner Circle:
- +C†I~→↑R~↓↑↓↑G~↓
[The
arrows above represent a continuous dashed curving line in the ms.
diagram.]
At
this stage one may simply not be ready for it. On the other hand, it
may be a measure of my failure: it may be what tends to carry one on
round the Outer Circle again. In this case I may have been given a
second chance. I believe that one must carry Christ within one round
the Inner Circle. I am heartened by the feeling that the Communion
had taken place before my worldly fears took over: I am not even sure
that my rejection actually had any effect on the experience, which
may have already been completed before I began to react in this way.
*[See
last two previous entries.]
[PostedBlogger21082017]
[ms.
image inserted in ts. and postedBlogger 21092017]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.