{Learning [continued (3)]}[7th October 1987]

[Redbook4:121][19871007:2330c]{Learning [continued (3)]}[7th October 1987]

19871007.2330

[continued]

I have no particular bias for Academics: in my contacts with them I have almost always felt despised, oppressed and inhibited. If anything, I sympathise with the opposite side from their Intellection: Innovation, where Creation is[,] on the Inner Circle, and Artists play with the holy or unholy fire of their sub-creations while ordinary lives crumble around them into the ruin of worldly ambition. But this analysis* arises from the Circles, and I think that it is most likely to be correct.**

I think, too, that it shows (to use modern jargon) what an immensely powerful tool Circles Analysis can be.

*[See last previous entry (and last previous entry but one).]

**cf. III[[Redbook3:147-150][19870409:1345](QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS{1})[9th April 1987]].147[ff],

III[[Redbook3:156][19870409:1345l](QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS(2))[9th April 1987]].156,

where this polarity (which seems to pre-occupy me) is seen from a different point of view but along similar lines. <871008>

[continues]

[PostedBlogger12122016]