{Generalisation and Specialisation}[14th October 1987]

[Redbook4:124][19871014:2155b]{Generalisation and Specialisation}[14th October 1987]

19871014.(2155c)

[continued]

If I remember rightly, the idea,* about Generalisation and Specialisation, came to the speculative conclusion that Generalisation was more representative of the [+C]I~ polarity, and Specialisation of the [+Mk]A~ polarity.** But there was a great deal before this which seemed interesting at the time, and is now lost in the sense that I cannot remember whether it was what I now think or not: I have lost the cohesion provided with the original idea. It is an interesting process....

*[See last previous entry.]

**But cf. S&C [the original paper version, presumably] (e.g.) 6-4 – specialisation growing to end of cycle. <930503>

cf. V.19.

[continues]

[PostedBlogger15122016]