{Research and Development [continued(3)]}[12th July 1987]

[Redbook4:41][19870712:1000i]{Research and Development [continued(3)]}[12^th July 1987]

19870712.1000

[continued]

Inner-driven R&D*

				(Cerebral)
				Attraction
				Unity
Temperance				(←)**				Prudence
(Self-control)	(Intuition)	Love	IDEA		PRODUCT-ION	Harmony	(Intellection)	(including Marketing & Selling)
Charity	(Inspirational)	Revelation	↓	☼	↑	Action	(Analytical)	Faith
Fortitude	(Innovation)	Creation	RESEARCH	(&)	DEVELOP-MENT	Evolution	(Implementation)	Justice
				→
				Diversity
				(Manufactoral)
				Hope

**[This arrow is dashed not bracketed in the ms.]

– this possibly helps to explain why scientists of genius (I refer to their method of cerebration, not to their achievements – cf. The Sistine Chapel's Genii) should not, on the whole, attempt to put their ideas into commercial production themselves, but should hand over the task to men able to do it – those with management, business and technical skills.*** The crucial question is: when?

The answer which emerges is, I think, between Research (when the genius confirms and refines his idea by experiment) and Development (when the technician moulds it to the requirements of the ensuing stages, i.e., basically, the market-place). For recognition, I think that in the first instance the Idea is still the dominant influence on the work, even if the eventual function or market is in mind; in the second instance the market function dominates the work on the result of the original idea. There is, however, a semi-conscious link from the market back to the origination of ideas; if this becomes too conscious and forced or willed a process of cerebration, the Circle is reversed and becomes Outer Circle.

*[See last two previous entries & next entry.]

**[This arrow is dashed not bracketed in the ms.]

***(who should also follow related but separate Circles.) <870817>

[continues]

[PostedBlogger03082016]