[Redbook2:349][19841021:1315]{The
Ends of Art}[21st October 1984]
19841021.1315
The
led-up to the Booker Prize – I did not see the ceremony – led me
to identify one wrongness in the Arts prize system.
A
product of Artistic work as we see it – a painting, say, or a book
– is the most visible result, the surface effect, of a most
profound and subtle process. The prize system treats the product
itself as the most profound
aspect of the artistic process, the starting-point – on which the
arts industry is to be built.
One
response to this is to make discreet the whole business of prizes, so
that they become a genuine support for those assessed (however
crudely) as worthy of support – more like bursaries, perhaps, than
rewards. Works need not be submitted formally by publishers etc. –
although every artist should be able to publicize [sic]
himself – but the prize 'judges' would be able to examine the whole
of their field before offering support. The support, offered
discreetly, could be freely refused*.
Artists,
for their part, should learn to see the works produced as their own
justification**. The need for recognition and for income should be
met in whatever ways are most suitable, whether or not they involve
the use of artistic products after completion, and without affecting
the integrity of the artistic process.
*Of
course! <930119>
**i.e.
the works' justification <930119>
[Posted Blogger26082015]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.