{Left and Right Conflict (3) [continued]}[31st October 1990]

[Redbook8:83][19901031:1753b]{Left and Right Conflict (3) [continued]}[31st October 1990]

.1753

[continued]

It is important to detach oneself from personal viewpoints.

Resistance is defined generally in relation to the Authority preceding; and authority, generally, in relation to the resistance preceding. c[irca] G~ is often seen as a time of disaster because the records are those of the authority being resisted; in the decline of the Roman Empire, the resisters, who had not much in the way of records, probably thought their times were rather a good thing.

(This is a special case because the western Roman Empire’s 1,000 year bridging cycle overlaps with the current Western European Germanic 2048-year cycle: what is G~ for the Roman Empire therefore really is at the same time, or immediately after, M~ for the Germans.** For separated* cycles, one would expect less or no overlap, even a lull or vacuum at C before the mass migrations of resistance, from G~, organise themselves into the new authority, to M~.)

*[ie contiguous sequential, presumably]

**The invaders may be G~ for the land they invade and the cycle they affect; for the land they left, and in the time and the local cycle in which they decided to do so, they may have been M~,*** or G~ on a different scale.

(Personal tribal cycles are not necessarily consistent with historical cycles – but are likely to be heavily influenced by them.)

***[Surely more likely to be the other way round? There still (cf last entry but one, [Redbook8:82][19901031:1540e]{Anglo-Saxon Cycles [continued (4)]}[31st October 1990]) seems to be a confusion here about G~, which like M~ is more consistently perceived (per last previous entry) as being associated directly with (collective) states of mind, & only indirectly (consequentially) with external events.]

[PostedBlogger13082022]