[Redbook5:57][19880314:1115g]{Fundamental
Points of View [continued
(7)]}[14th
March 1988]
19880314.1115
[continued]
I
would sum up this particular man,* personally, as typical of a
particular kind of man who has a considerable ability to acquire new
academic knowledge – perhaps through not having used up his memory
capacity in previous academic work, but this is speculation – but
not a highly developed ability to manipulate that knowledge.**
From things he has said, I would say that he is just past forty;
considers himself to be of working class origins, and was once proud
of it; was probably a builder,*** most likely of craftsman status;
and was made redundant relatively recently. All these things, and
his relatively 'specialised' and single-minded approach to the
matter, suggest a man whose natural or starting position was perhaps
around U~. (However, something was said suggesting a birthday
relatively recently.) Knowledge is the gift [sic]
of the Spirit at U~.****
The
three examples he referred to of temptations, in the context of those
who had been born again (who would be highly unlikely to give way [to
them,] as well as [in the context] of those who had not [been born
again] (and who would not),# involved, respectively:#* lechery;
avarice; and pride. These are at U~, M~ and S~: in other words, in
reverse order, the three most likely to carry a Man from Attraction,
round the Outer Circle. In this context, I should have thought that
taking a Degree of a theological kind would involve dangers of
precisely this nature: especially Pride (at Ordination, although he
does not intend to be actually ordained); and especially for a man
with a closed mind.
*[See
last 6 previous entries, [Redbook5:51-61][19880314:1115]{Fundamental
Points of View}[14th March 1988] ff.]
**{He
has recently deferred his first
year course – due to difficulties with the academic approach to
comparative religion, I gather.)
***{Painter
and Decorator, in fact.}
****[See
e.g. [Redbook4:45][19870712:1840d]{The
Gifts of the Spirit (2)}[12th
July 1987].]
#[be
highly unlikely to give way, presumably – all this in brackets ( )
of course is the perceived opinion of the man in question, not of the
writer.]
#*[Unclear
respectively to what; perhaps
intended to be respectively to U~,
M~ and S~ in the next sentence (which placing is as in
[Redbook4:13-14][19870707:1000]{Virtues
and Vices (2)}[7th
July 1987]
(“This
hierarchy of vices comes from E[ncylopaedia] B[ritannica] XVII.382
(instead of Dante)”).]
[continues]
[PostBlogger22for23012018]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.