(PERSONAL JURISDICTIONS)[30th April 1987]

[Redbook3:216-217][19870430:2210c](PERSONAL JURISDICTIONS)[30th April 1987]

19870430.2210

[continued]

It is an interesting point, as to whether, in the theoretical World Order*, although some jurisdictions attach to the Individual by the Territory in which he finds himself – e.g. land ownership, commerce, and administration of physical services; others would do so by the Culture to which he belongs through Race** – e.g. marriage and other family matters; with ***arrangements for inter-racial marriages, and for optional transfer between jurisdictions by adults. Of course these matters are often hard to disentangle (e.g. marriage often has landed property implications); and the fundamental rights of the Individual would be protected at the highest level, overruling all other jurisdictions (e.g. territorial, cultural/racial) by a human Individual jurisdiction, of a permissive but [sic] not restrictive nature (on the Individual). What is interesting about this idea is that it embodies some of the features of Apartheid.****

*(p.176-180 [Redbook3:176-180][19870412:2137](FREEDOM AND COMMUNITY)[12th April 1987]

19870412.2137]2f])

**[/Religion, presumably? <20160402>]

***{i.e. 'there being'}

****The answer is to make voluntary transfer available to all. <880806>

[PostedBlogger02062016]