{Succession of Media in Artistic Movements}[23rd September 1990]

[Redbook7:323-326][19900923:1945h]{Succession of Media in Artistic Movements}[23rd September 1990]

.1945

[continued]

The notions* that economics, at A~, should oscillate most from the regular cycle,** and religious revival at C least (both of which notions show indications of being true[)], imply of course that cultural-revolutionary and ‘imperialistic’-military affairs should come somewhere between, as the G~-M~ axis (unless G~ is expected to oscillate yet more wildly, which seems unlikely).***

This is not altogether born out by a possible tendency for new cultural movements to introduce themselves first in painting, then in literature, and finally in music: for instance, in the case of Modernism it seems possible to argue that literature may have followed visual art:**** the former before, and the latter after, the # Great War, on the notional (as yet unconfirmed, because as yet unresearched) 64-year cycle for culture.

On the 8-times-larger scale of the 512-year cycle, the ‘classicism’ of the Renaissance visual artists seems to have preceded (in the 15th-16th centuries) the full flowering of classicism in literature, #* if that can be said to have occurred in France (17^thC[entury]), England (18thC[entury]), and Germany; in music the great ‘classical’ period arises in the late 18^th century.

*ref [[Redbook7:291][19900914:0940]{Integration of Cycles (2)}[14th September 1990],&f(?),] 291, &c?

[& see [Redbook7:290][19900913:2209e]{Integration of Cycles (1)}[13th September 1990]]

**[See last previous entry]

***[& difficult to incorporate?]

****ref [[Redbook7:312-314][19900921:1435]{Fin de Siècle}[21st September 1990],] 313A

#[1914-18]

#*ref (& pace) E[ncylopaedia] B[ritannica] 3:355-6

[continued]

[PostedBlogger20for21032022]