[Redbook7:317][19900921:1045f]{Cycle Periods [continued (6)]}[21st September 1990]
.1045
[continued]
The fact that 4096 years is not nearly as strong a cycle as it should be,* given the speculative progression 1 – 8 – 64 – 512 – 4096, may simply reflect the lack of historical records before about 1000bce.**
Looking at it like this, these 5 numbers seem to represent something like natural dividers and meeting points of different scales for Mankind.***
*{Isn’t it?}
**{Or simply the fact that if 0ce was a 4096 year crisis C point, we do not have one complete 4096 year cycle within Human history (ie c3000bce to 1990ce)}
***[See next entry]
[continued]
[PostedBlogger09for10032022]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.