{Cycle Periods [continued (7)]}[21st September 1990]

[Redbook7:318][19900921:1045f]{Cycle Periods [continued (7)]}[21st September 1990]

.1045

[continued]

Looking at it like this, these 5 numbers* seem to represent something like natural dividers and meeting points of different scales for Mankind.** It might go something like this:

[Table extracted from ms table reproduced above:]

											? ↓
(2∞?)	→	0	\	\
		<1	}	\						}Obvious natural cycles	C?
20	→	1	/	\
21		2		}						}1-8 years: ?Individual projects	S~?
22		4		|	\
23	(1x8) =>	8		/	\						M~?
24		16		/	|
25		32			}	\				}Individual life cycles	U?
26	(8x8) =>	64			/	\				← BASIC HISTORICAL CYCLE ←Collective cycles based on spontaneous individual processes	A~?
27		128			/	|	?	\
28		256				}	?	}	\	}(Notional 3) (eg Artistic movements)	J~?
29	(64x8) =>	512				/	?	/	\		G~
210		1024				/			}	}Collective cycles based on constructed collective institutions
211		2048							|	\(eg Empires, Religions)	R~?
212	(512x8) =>	4096							/		C?
(213)		(8192)							/		(cf ***)
		….

****

It’s clear that

(a) the shorter groups spread at each end, so the longer may too; and

(b) the 128 and 256 year cycle slots still expect to be filled....

The column on the right offers a better,# though still highly speculative,#* pattern for the apparent lack of 128 and 256 cycles: they occur at J~, Fragmentation.

*[1, 8, 64, 512,4096; see last previous entry]

**[Sentence repeated, in ts & blog only, only from last previous entry]

***(cf [(presumably,) [Redbook7:317][19900921:1045e]{Cycle Periods [continued (5)]}[21st September 1990],] 317)

****[Where two forward or backward slashes occur one above the other, the outermost one(s) above or below the centre ‘}’ are shown hatched (ie less certain, more speculative) in the ms]

#(ie than on [presumably, [Redbook7:317][19900921:1045e]{Cycle Periods [continued (5)]}[21st September 1990],] p317)

#*{& arbitrary, I’d say}

[continued]

[PostedBlogger09for11032022]