{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (4)}[19th February 1990]

[Redbook7:67-68][19900219:1037h]{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (4)}[19th February 1990]

19900219.1037

[continued]

*Back** to the relationship between different sequential | circles:

Summary so far (revised)[:]

[I.]

(1) Earlier cycles influence their super cycle

(2) A cycle influences later sub cycles

(3) At C, cycles influence immediately subsequent:

(a) Super cycles – weakly?

(b) Cycles (ie of equal period) – moderately?

(c) Sub cycles – strongly?***

(by comparison with each other – not by comparison with I’s ability to overcome them).

***(These [(c), sub-cycles] may form the crisis resolution period for the super cycle(s)’ crisis, hence frequently the intensity of the Individual’s conflict in the effort to establish his freedom against the cyclical forces carrying [him] forward.)

*[[Redbook7:65][19900219:1037d]{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (3) [continued]}[19th February 1990],] 65 →

**ref [[Redbook7:64-65][19900219:1037c]{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (3)}[19th February 1990],] 65

[(& ref last previous entry)]

***[See ***text above]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger16012021]