{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (4) [continued]}[19th February 1990]

[Redbook7:67-68][19900219:1037i]{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (4) [continued]}[19th February 1990]

19900219.1037

[continued]

II.* Within a super cycle, the relationship of sequential equal(-period) cycles is dependent upon, or at least related to, the (relationship between) the degrees of the super cycle(s). (I imagine that the general influence of cycles on super cycles gets weaker, and on sub cycles stronger(?), the further they are from C on the larger cycle of the relationship).**

Influence must be reduced both by the passage of time (at least between the end of the influencing cycle and the start of the influenced cycle); and also must depend [sic] upon the relative size (period-term) of each cycle.

So, for example, it is well known that childhood experiences affect later life, but it is (I believe) believed that the earlier the experience, the more profound and lasting the effect. C[ircles] A[nalysis] & S[ynthesis] suggests a slightly different pattern eg (using my own as an example):***

****

*[For [I], see last previous entry]

** ‘He has put down the mighty from their seat and has exalted the humble and meek.’

***[A chart begun here in the ms is unfinished and struck through, with the words: “Hmm, no – not helpful. I need a break; some Greek?”]

****→[[Redbook7:72-81][19900226:2049]{Crisis Resolution in Personal Cycles (5)}[19th February 1990],] 72

[PostedBlogger17012021]