{False Christs; True Christ [continued (9)]}[16th March 1988]

[Redbook5:73][19880316:1300k]{False Christs; True Christ [continued (9)]}[16th March 1988]

19880316.13

[continued]

There are other* Archetypes, of course; and this is where Hinduism has the advantage over extreme Protestantism, in that it recognises this factor. Extreme Protestantism recognises only Christ and the Devil, in effect; and this is not enough to even begin to explain the diversity of the world in which they** live. Only a narrow or limited vision could think that it was. There are multiple choices to be made, multiple implications to be faced, compromises accepted, in the most mundane actions: taking a drink of water; buying oranges; driving a car. Hinduism, with its plethora of demons, at least may be said to go some way towards facing this. Fundamentalist Protestantism doesn't.

What Hinduism lacks, plainly, is Christ: although Krishna may be an attractive Outer-Circle[-]type hint of the Christ archetype in advance of Jesus, no system which had understood the Quality of Christ could continue as Hinduism does with its corruption of ***un-coordinated forces.****

*[See last previous entry.]

**[The extreme Protestants – presumably?]

***{(apparently)}

I think 'corruption' describes the state [i.e. condition], not the process, here. <891007>

****[See next entry but one: [Redbook5:74-75][19880316:1300m]{False Christs; True Christ [continued (11)]}[16th March 1988]]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger12for13022018]