{Small World (1)}[14th February 1988]

[Redbook5:17][19880214:2326b]{Small World (1)}[14^th February 1988]

19880214.2326

[continued]

I have remarked before on multiple co-incidences between particular works of fiction and the '[0]' series and concept.* Another example occurs with David Lodge's 'Small World',** of which I am watching the T.V. series dramatisation (I have not read the book). Often the co-incidences follow naturally from a given idea; sometimes, however, they are significant enough to suggest a possible explanation in archetype*** theory, which should hardly surprise me.

*Co-incidences have frequently been noted by others between fictional works, and between fiction and reality.

**[David Lodge, 'Small World: An Academic Romance' (1984)]

***[Or stereotype! – which, to be fair, is a natural result of archetype. <20170922>]

[& See [Redbook5:20][19880221:1030]{Small World (2)}[21st February 1988];

[Redbook5:21][19880229:0045]{Small World (3)}[29^th February 1988];

[Redbook5:21-22][19880229:0940]{Small World (3) [continued]}[29th February 1988];

[Redbook5:49-50][19880312:2005c]{The Grail Quest Circle}[12th March 1988].]

[PostedBlogger01for02122017]