[Redbook1:65][19680724:1800]{Queer
peer}[24th July 1968][Age 17]
Wednesday, 24th July
1968.
6.0 p.m.
Yesterday
was very busy, so I will excuse myself.
We [sic] had a cocktail
party. About forty guests turned up --
ten less than expected; mostly very dull but important people. Lord X is apparently a queer; I am told that
he fondled B, who of course (luckily) saw nothing in it, and that he was
desperate for B to go to his boys club.
His wife dealt with him tactfully but firmly. M is worried now about whether this will
always happen to B. I don't think it
will; X was high on champagne.
On Thursday
last, D went down to the Inquiry again, and I went with him. When his turn came -- he was acting for
himself and Mr. N [(a neighbour)] (I hope I've spelt it right) -- he first
showed that (a) hearsay evidence could be accepted and (b) planning inquiries
should take human etc. considerations
into account -- especially use of the property concerned. Then he read his prepared Statement as a
witness – No. II, the watered down version; then [...], for the Appellants,
cross-examined him and tried to make him look ridiculous -- but failed dismally. D thus opened the way for local objectors;
but Counsel for the Council, [...], stuck to planning, like a clot.
[PostedBlogger12102012]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.