{Economic Cycles (2)}[14th September 1990]

[Redbook7:291][19900914:0940b]{Economic Cycles (2)}[14th September 1990]

19900914.0940

[continued]

*

**

It is necessary to define economic prosperity as occurring between bust and boom, or between downswing and upswing, as a period of ‘recovery’: since boom seems inevitably to lead to crisis at C, and bust; it is also necessary to allow for greater variation in periods for economic activity than for the others[.]*** We need to look at the underlying realities of the economy, not at the appearance, which is likely to follow by a considerable period-proportion.

*{cf [[Redbook7:279][19900911:1036b]{Economic Cycles}[11th September 1990],] 279,

[[Redbook7:320][1990090923:1945]{Economic Cycles (3)}[23rd September 1990],] 320}

**ref VI [[Redbook6:329-332][19891025:0931b]{Economic Cycles}[25th October 1989],] 329ff,

[[Redbook6:333][19891026:1125d]{Schumpeter K [, Kondratieff, & Juglar] Cycles [continued]}[26th October 1989]&/orAnt?,] 333

***(ref [[Redbook7:290][19900913:2209e]{Integration of Cycles (1)}[13th September 1990],] 290)

[PostedBlogger04022022]