{Self-referential Spin [continued]}[5th January 1990]

[Redbook7:15[19900105:1843b]{Self-referential Spin [continued]}[5th January 1990]

.1843

[continued]

I stress the last term* because a revolution or spin which is in some way incomplete – less than or greater than one, for example – does imply external space, requires it in fact, and creates the (or some of the) co-ordinates of that external space by the description of its own spin (ie on the analogy(?) of Polar-to-Cartesian co-ordinate conversion).

The incompleteness may be in (or into) an additional dimension – this possibility I expect would have to be a ‘given’, but the actuality once again** could be described self-referentially, I think, in terms of the individual alone and the existence (only) of the dimension into which it moved. *** Such a spin would be, in effect, not so much a non-unit spin as a spiral.****

As it happens, of course, when we examine the most fundamental levels of the Universe – as well as the most astronomical – what do we find, again and again? – Spin.#

.1907

*[‘or implied’, at the end of the last previous entry]

**[See last previous entry]

***Assuming non-reversible time? – in effect.

****It might arise through (later) interaction with other spinning individuals, in a developing Universe.

#[But see [Redbook5:199][19880701.1753c]{(Extract: Particle Spin)}[1st July 1988], fn*]

[PostedBlogger03for05112020]