[Redbook6:291-293][19891006:0908]{Love
and Sex (9) continued [continued
(3)]}[6th
October 1989]
19891006:0908
The
last part of the article above* is a demonstration of a man trying in
all sincerity to prove to himself that he believes something which he
does not really believe at all. I’ve reached a watershed, and have
formally to acknowledge that my views on love and sex, pre-marital,
marital and extra-marital, may fit the overall quality of Christ’s
person and teaching, but do not comply with what I believe to be the
Church’s interpretation of what Jesus is reported to have said on
the matter.
From
the starting point that no action is evil in itself, but that only
the state of mind can be evil – which is similar, but not
identical, to the mens rea doctrine of the English common law, and is
also I believe the main thrust of Jesus’ ‘moral’ teaching –
it follows that no sexual act can be considered to be evil:** and as
we are not gnostics, and do not believe that matter is in itself
evil, we cannot say that genital intercourse (or physical
intercourse) are evil in that respect either.
We
may consider that a certain level or type (mentally speaking) of
genital intercourse is symptomatic
of a low level of spiritual development, refinement or integration:
that is, one in which love is not predominant. We also may say that
the predominance of self-less Love must mean that factors such as the
feelings of other parties (spouses, children) must be considered, and
that to wilfully ignore their feelings would be wilfully to turn away
from the Spirit of God in others: and wilful separation from God is
evil. So each case will be judged – is judged – on its merits,
on its circumstances and in the mind of the individual: and not by
us. Our function is not to judge, but to guide. And when we guide,
our guidance is not primarily to be ethical – e.g. ‘Think of your
wife’[,] ‘Try to keep things together for the sake of the
children’. The primary guidance is to live in the Spirit – from
which the rest follows.
*[See
last previous journal entry]
**[as
such; in itself]
[continues]
[PostedBlogger29062020]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.