{Historical Circles (1) [continued (3)]}[26th July 1989]

[Redbook6:166][19890726:1118]{Historical Circles (1) [continued (3)]}[26th July 1989]

19890726.1118

I speculate as to another* periodicity – started above** – for which I have absolutely no historical evidence (I haven’t looked for it); but it is based on the same mathematical progression,** which seems to show its patterns in nature[’]s; or reversed; [sic]

	2Power	Year (Expansion steadying)	Approximately dated events		Years back (Accelerating deterioration)	Year Cum[ulative]	[Year] Non[-] cum[ulative]
o		0	Birth	O	2048
c	0	1		C	1024	1	1024
r~	1	2		S~	512	1025	1536
g~	2	4		M~	256	1537	1792
j~	3	8		U~	128	1793	1920
a~	4	16		A~	64	1921	1984
u~	5	32	Mission	J~	32	1985	2016
m~	6	64	1st Gospels	G~	16	2017	2032
s~	7	128	Destruction of Temple. Gnosticism.	R~	8	2033	2040
c	8	256	Bishop Stephen of Rome claims Peter’s authority.	C	4	2041	2044
----	-------	-----------	312 Conversion of Constantine. 410 Sack of Rome.	-----	----------------	-------------	--------------
r~	1	512			2	2045	2046
g~	2	1024			1	2047	2047
j~	3	2048			0	2048

The next deceleration would

be back from 4096 to 2048,

just as this was from 2048 to 1024,

and the last was from 1024 to 512.

At the same time, circles may follow

excluding each other (ie equal periods).

#

It is not obvious why a decelerating series (expanding spiral?) should be inner circle, and an accelerating series (contracting spiral?) should be outer; but given that peaceful times are times of little change, and that revolutions do seem to accelerate, that is how it seems to be.

*[See last 2 previous entries]

**[[Redbook6:165][19890726:1118]{Historical Circles (1) [continued]}[22nd July 1989]] p165 [Last previous entry]

****[sic – presumably referring to the preceding colun, not the succeeding one]

#See [[Redbook6:257][19890913:0927#]{Historical Circles (4)}[13^th September 1989],] 257,

[[Redbook6:152][19890713:1847i]{Pascal’s Church}[13th July 1989]&f,] 152

<901110>

[continues]

[PostedBlogger17for19122019]