{Theory and Verification [continued (7)]}[19th June 1988]

[Redbook5:176][19880619:1707e]{Theory and Verification [continued (7)]}[19^th June 1988]

19880619.1707

[continued]

*If it is possible to make specific experiential [sic] predictions arising out of this theory (and it does not have to be), are they correct? This arises out of (i)** and (ii)***above and is related to (iv)****(?); but, as explained above, it is not often appropriate for this type of theory.

*[See last previous entry but three, [Redbook5:175-176][19880619:1707]{Theory and Verification [continued (3)]}[18^th June 1988] 'The testing of any 'metaphysical' theory may involve several different approaches:'.]

**See last previous entry but three, [Redbook5:175-176][19880619:1707]{Theory and Verification [continued (3)]}[18^th June 1988]

***See last previous entry but two, [Redbook5:176][19880619:1707b]{Theory and Verification [continued (4)]}[18^th June 1988]

****[See last previous entry.]

#{& see [[Redbook5:179-181][19880619:2242#]{Near-Death Experiences]}[18^th June 1988],] p180}

#*[[Redbook5:173-178][19880618:2242d]{Theory and Verification}[18^th June 1988], para 2 on] p174

[continues]

[PostedBlogger04for06072018]