[Redbook8:156-157][19901224:2322]{Mesopotamian
Long Cycles}[24th December 1990]
.2322
The
narrative of history in ancient Mesopotamia* is even more confused on
the more recent, larger scale chart** than on the earlier one.***
There
are occasional |indications of|**** clusters which might be
significant, eg of ‘internal’ dissension at G~ degrees and
significant breaks at C, but not enough to provide a clear pattern.
For
shorter periods, eg 64 years, dating is too inaccurate until 1450bce
at the earliest.
For
longer periods, it may be significant that c2500-1500[bce] is
described# as a period of almost continual clashes between separatist
forces. Such a long period, c1000 years, suggests part of a very
long (in historical terms) cycle: at least 4096 years (¼, ie 1/8th
each way), perhaps 8192 years (1/8th). If the 4096 year cycle C is
at 0ce, c2048bce (the centre of the unsettled 1000 years) is 4096
year A~; if the 8192#* year cycle C is at 0ce, 2048bce is 8192#* year
G~.#* *
*ref
[[Redbook8:31-32][19901015:1017b]{4,000
Years BC[E] – Commentary (1) [continued]}[15th October 1990],]
31
**ref
[[Redbook8:44-67][19901027ff]{Comparative
Chronology}[27th October 1990],]
47-59;
***
[ref
[Redbook8:28-29][19901015:1710]{Four
Thousand Years BC[E]}*[15th October 1990],]
29
****[Words
between | & | inserted in ms]
#(per
E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica])
#*[Ms
has 8196, clearly a mistake for 8192]
#**See
[[Redbook8:44-67][19901027ff]{Comparative
Chronology}[27th October 1990],]
50-54 for spread.
[continued]
[PostedBlogger11012023]