{Modern Art [continued (121)]}{Impressionism}[Extracts from source text with ms notes][16th May 1991]

[Redbook10:101*][#19910516:0930jo]{Modern Art [continued (121)]}{Impressionism}[Extracts from source text with ms notes][16th May 1991]

19910516:(0930c)#

**

(Impressionism)

My intention is not to reproduce any of the Impressionist paintings by photocopying here, mainly because colour is too important; but it is becoming apparent that even the colour reproductions in the E[ncyclopaedia of] V[isual A[rt] (which I could have cut out of my damaged set,*** only I can't bear to – and it would deprive [d] and [s] of more of the set) are unlikely to do justice to the originals – far more so than is the case with most painting.****

*[ms page 100 left blank]

**(See illus[tration]s in E[ncyclopaedia of] V[isual A[rt] & E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica])

***[As space was tight, the set had been left under or near to a radiator which leaked on it. Insurers paid out for a new set.]

****(Note upright [hand]writing….)

[continued]

[PostedBlogger3008for08092026]

#[Uncorrected date discrepancy:

From ms/ts p35 to p89 the ms date was accidentally left unchanged in the ts until after the blog had been posted. The ts date was subsequently corrected but the error remains in the blog. The header date-time reference has been left unchanged in both, partly to avoid cross-referencing problems.

The correct text dates for the blog should therefore be read as:

pp35-68 (1^st entry): 19910513:0916;

pp68-89 (1^st entry): 19910514:0902;

pp89-100: 19910515:0950.]