{Doubling Life Cycles [continued (7)]}[5th January 1989]

[Redbook6:86)][19890105:1022j]{Doubling Life Cycles [continued (7)]}[5th January 1989]

19890105.1022

[continued]

If you take into account this super-cycle,* incidentally, the K-K-Q-K sequence jumps up one level from 16- to 32-year-cycles, ie

(Youth)	0-32	Knave	(was 0-16,	Childhood)
(Career)	33-64	Knight	(was 17-32)	(Youth)
(Retirement)	65-96	Queen	(was 33-48)	(Adulthood)
	97-128	King	(was 49-64)

What this means is not that the previous (16-year) cycle attribution was wrong, but that it is a good sequence for an average lifespan. A typical life might instead run for the first two 32-year cycles and part of the third – a small part in most cases: at retirement transformation to the Inner Circle is perhaps easier, than at any other time, although despite this many upon retirement either busy themselves with new work or simply lose their direction, and die.

*[ie 128 years, presumably]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger18for22082019]