{Catholic Circles [continued]}[25th December 1988]

[Redbook6:71)][19881225:0115b]{Catholic Circles [continued]}[25th December 1988]

19881225.0115

[continued]

If that* is correct, +C’s speech to xS at the end of her dance in [2]** should not be read to literally as implying that the return is not via +C, but ‘by’ should be read in the sense of passing by {means of}’:

‘Through [+Mk] Men will find you, and die;

and through Death you will send them

on by me to [+Mk] again,

or through Love, back through him to me.’

I think the key to this – although some might think me guilty of distortion – is that the Love which +C says xS is,*** is the Love of +C† himself. To fully appreciate this it may be necessary to consider the relationship of Father, Son, and Spirit as previously seen**** in the Circle pattern:

[Text extracted from ms images above:]

– in 2 dimensions;

		Spirit
		Father
		Son
		|
	\		/

or:

– in 3 dimensions

	C
	|
	Son
R~		S~
\		/
	Father (3rd D[imension])
–	.	–
	Spirit
/		\
	|

The second sending# by xS is by her on the Inner Circle: they have already returned, through +C.

*[See last previous entry, final paragraph]

**[Subject to change]

***[“You are Love; and to Love, all things are forgiven. But you are also Death; and you know now for yourself how closely Love and Death come together. Death forgives nothing, for it has nothing to forgive. And Death is forgiven nothing, for there is no-one to forgive Death: save Love alone, who forgives all.” (ts subject to change)]

****Vol III [[Redbook3:213][19870419:1050j](THE STRUCTURE OF TOTALITY [continued(3)])[19th April 1987] (et al?)]/ IV [[Redbook4:90-91][19871003:1650h]{Circles of the Spirit}[3rd October 1987] (et al?)]?

#{=??}

[PostedBlogger04082019]