{Doubling Life Cycles [continued (4)]}[5th January 1989]

[Redbook6:85)][19890105:1022g]{Doubling Life Cycles [continued (4)]}[5th January 1989]

19890105.1022

[continued]

More rigorously, here is the same pattern:*

[Text extracted from ms chart reproduced above 
(as a scanned typescript because the typed chart would not translate into Blogger):]

On the whole, the (n +/- √n) formula gives better results as well as ‘feeling’ more appropriate.

*[See last previous entry]

**Above the line -------- the effect might actually be reversed.)

***==> End of actual work, for many

[continues]

[PostedBlogger18for19082019]