{Revelation and Reason}[1st September 1990]

[Redbook7:271*][19900901:2312]{Revelation and Reason}[1st September 1990]

19900901.2312

It’s worth clarifying something which I hope has been implied: that if ‘Revelation’ follows an O[uter] C[ircle] path (when it presumably originates in a radial resonance to Revolution at G~), it passes through Ordination** to become dogma and part of the assumptions basing rationalisation, on an ultimately disintegrating circuit; whereas if Revelation follows an I[nner] C[ircle] path, it is subjected to rational analysis on an integrating circuit through evolution*** and harmony.****

*This entry should have been between pp 272 & 273

**[at S~]

***[at u~]

****[at s~]

[PostedBlogger30122021]