{Star Cycles (III) [continued] – The Cycle of the Universe}[21st November 1987]

[Redbook4:163][19871121:1310]{Star Cycles (III) [continued] – The Cycle of the Universe}[21st November 1987]

19871121.1310

But the explanation on p161 (foot)* does not really explain the Circles in terms of qualities or principles, as it should. For example, the possible fate of the Universe can plausibly be described in terms of Outer Circle rotation, i.e.:

		Attraction
		UNITY
		→| |→
	Simplification		Ordination
	↑		↓
Revolution		☼		Action
	↑		↓
	Fragmentation		Complication
	↑		↓
		Distraction

[In the ms diagram the arrows curve clockwise round the circle.]

– so long as you translate some of the terms into the equivalents appropriate to a cosmic scale (they were developed primarily to describe Human affairs).

The Inner Circle –

		Attraction
		←| |←
	Love		Harmony
Revelation		☼		Action
	Creation		Evolution
		Diversity

[In the ms diagram the two arrows curve clockwise as arcs of the circle.]

– obviously, appears to need no more translation than the Outer – possibly rather less.

I guess that the key may be in resonances, and (particularly) in contra-rotation.**

The diagram can equally be drawn (consistently with colours):

[Diagram	text:]			WHITE DWARF	White
					←B←	?
		Yellow		A		O	Blue
			F
			G
		K
(G~)	Orange	↓			☼			Indigo	[M~]
	RED GIANT	M
	Red
							Violet
				NEBULAE
					Black
					A~

*[[Redbook4:161-162][19871121:0200]{Star Cycles (II) [continued (4)]– Circles and Spirals}[21st November 1987]]

**(not needed? – see below [[Redbook4:163-164][19871121:1310b]{Star Cycles (III) [continued] – The Main Sequence}[21st November 1987]], next para[graph].)

[continues]

[PostedBlogger06for07022017]