{Star Cycles (II) [continued (4)]– Circles and Spirals}[21st November 1987]

[Redbook4:161-162][19871121:0200]{Star Cycles (II) [continued (4)]– Circles and Spirals}[21st November 1987]

19871121.0200

But why is the Main Sequence for our Galactic Spiral Arm and Open Clusters, unlike its branches and unlike the apparent sequence for more 'closed'* (?) bodies or circles of Stars, an inner Circle rotation? The analogy** may be with Individuals' development: the Outer Circle is perhaps 'closed' in the sense that staying on it simply takes one round again; the Inner Circle is perhaps 'open' in that it is a spiral (outwards or inwards being symbolically identical, except in relation to the Outer Circle): passing round it, one does not return exactly through the start point,*** but nearer to the centre.

*i.e. Globular Clusters, the Galactic central bulge, & elliptical external Galaxies (ref. [[Redbook4:155][19871119:2312f]{Star Cycles (I) [continued] – Colours [continued]}[19^th November 1987],]] p.156). <871121>

It isn't. <871123>

**{(This analogy, although interesting re Circles, is unnecessary – see [[Redbook4:163][19871121:1310]{Star Cycles (III) – The Cycle of the Universe}[21st November 1987] & [Redbook4:163-164][19871121:1310b]{Star Cycles (III) – The Main Sequence}[21st November 1987]] p163-4.)}

***Nor does one physically on the Outer (or physical) Circle <871123>.

{(See [[Redbook4:168][19871121:2225#]{Diametric Resonance and Circle Polarity (1)}[21st November 1987]] p168)}

[PostedBlogger04022017]