Thursday, 12 May 2016

{Quality relationships (3): Dynamic Independence [continued(3)]}[16th April 1987]

[Redbook3:198-199][19870416:1730c]{Quality relationships (3): Dynamic Independence [continued(3)]}[16th April 1987]

19870416.1730
[continued]

If this* is right, it means that something is lacking in the analysis of Knowledge** leading up to the chart on p.193***. I thought at first that it must be in the definition of the class of Quality (i.e. by Objective Reality and the Quality of Absolute Truth) which seems (to me) to lead logically to the conclusion that the Quality of Absolute Truth exist as (e.g.) a Fundamental Principle****.

However, there is another question which has been of concern, and which I had considered unrelated, which is: what is the (Quality of) Absolute Truth? I think the lesson of intuitive distaste for having God proved by Hatred and Anger (inter alia) is that “logic” can only take one so far: or, as it was put in “[2]”, perhaps: “God is the Truth beyond Proof, or not”. The existence of any (inner) quality or feeling having Objective Reality and the Quality of Absolute Truth indicates that the Quality of Absolute Truth exists: this is perhaps the only way in which this type of logic can describe the Absolute, God. (Another type of logic might indicate the Fundamental Cause 'behind' the Big Bang at the start of the Universe: the Creator-Scientist aspect of God). One should not be shocked at a God indicated by hatred and anger, inter alia: we are responsible for these emotions and states of mind. God, after all, is also the Poetic# God, the Totality, encompassing everything.


*[See last previous entry.]

**[[Redbook3:118-131][19870405:1057](BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE{1})[5th April 1987] & [Redbook3:184-193][19870414:1003](BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE (2))[14th April 1987].]

***{!} [[Redbook3:193][19870414:1003j](BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE (2) [continued(10)]: Diagram of Belief and Knowledge – Relation to Truth)[14th April 1987]]

****{?}

#[Presumably in the sense at [Redbook3:59][19870329:1210h](DEVELOPMENT [continued(5)])[29th March 1987].]

[continues]


[PostedBlogger12052016]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.