[Redbook1:265][19721105:1736]{Thalidomide}[5th
November 1972]
Sunday 197211051736
Distillers
could by now have paid the victims handsome lump sums – perhaps £1,000,000 each*,
inadequate but practical – over the intervening years, and no-one would have
noticed but the shareholders. Or have I
missed something?
As it is they have acted against
the interests of the children, themselves and private enterprise at large.
I think the
time may have come to frighten Distillers.
Their shareholders have remained quiet too long for their own
conscience. We have shares in
Distillers. The General Meeting could
become a powerful weapon to force them to realise their responsibilities. Never mind whose moral fault it was --
Distillers caused the accident.
If that
doesn't work, a few sharp Government statements -- avoiding matter sub judice
-- might help at the right time. Like:
‘Failing adequate arrangements, I intend that the assets of Distillers be
broken up and divided among the victims’.
What about
the shareholders sending all shares to a fund -- after all this is over -- to
be divided among the victims? (-- already suggested).
*even £200,000 would be something -- £10,000 p.a. at 5% -- +
legal costs (essential).
[PostedBlogger0212for29112013]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.