{4,000 Years BC[E] – Commentary (2) [continued]}[15th October 1990]

[Redbook8:34][19901015:2120b]{4,000 Years BC[E] – Commentary (2) [continued]}[15th October 1990]

.2120

[continued]

It is interesting to tabulate the number of lines of development* (a highly approximate indicator) at regular intervals:

Date bce	4096 cycle	(2048 cycle)	No. of lines
(or within 1/8th 4096 sector)**			(cancelling duplicates)
4096	C		0
3584	S~		0
3072	M~		1
2560	U~		1 / 2
2048	A~	(C)	6
1536	J~	(M~)	9-10
1024	G~	(A~)	12
	(cG~-R~)	(J~)		(c.16) (Max point just after midpoint between [4096]G~ & R~)
512	R~	(G~)	11
0	C	(C)	c.“1”	– Roman Empire, + invaders from the fringes

(This is a mildly tendentious conclusion!)

I would expect the 2048 year cycle to relate to specific areas: eg China, America, the Indus, the Middle East and the Aegean (the last two presumably also separate). Individual dynasties or periods within this would follow their own cycles, some more clearly related to 1/8 x 2028 (as for some of China and Greece, above),**** others – in more confused and ‘pluralistic’ parts of the World, such as Mesopotamia/Palestine – less so. I can’t see much more than this until I know more of their details.

Some of the miscellaneous middle Eastern kingdoms seem to fit within the 2048/8 pattern of arcs of cycle, but by no means all.

*[On the diagram at [Redbook8:28-29][19901015:1710]{Four Thousand Years BC[E]}[15th October 1990], presumably]

**[This sub-heading presumably refers to the fit of the lines in the 4^th column to the 1/8th sector centred on each of the 512-year intervals enumerated in this 1st column]

****ref [[Redbook8:30-32][19901015:1017]{4,000 Years BC[E] – Commentary (1)}[15th October 1990]] 30-31

****ref [[Redbook8:28-29][19901015:1710]{Four Thousand Years BC[E]}[15th October 1990],] 28-29

[PostedBlogger27062022]