{Revival Cycles (2) (continued)*}[13th September 1990]

[Redbook7:289][19900913:2209c]{Revival Cycles (2) (continued)*}[13th September 1990]

.2209

[continued]

The pattern of [hash-marked] revivals,** which are those identified precisely in the E[nyclopaedia] B[ritannica] article on Revivalism*** (ie those after c1700, and basically Anglo-American), seems unmistakeable: only when the Churches start to force things do we find evangelism waves outlasting the C-M~/g~ sector of the 64-year cycle. But at G~/m~ we find a kind of pre-echo of a freer, more artistic religious spirit, with the Shakers in the first 2 cycles (c1776 and c1840), and perhaps the Flower Children of the Sixties in the most recent.

(The period from 1888 64A~**** to 1952 64A~**** is a blank in other ways too, more so in its centre. It is, of course, the 512G~ sector, so I suppose could represent some form of breakdown of patterns,# being most powerful with the C represented by international war (1914-18)#* which is more usually a sign of M~.)

*[Redbook7:288][19900913:2209]{Revival Cycles (2)}[13th September 1990]→

**[See previous last entry but one*]

***E[nyclopaedia] B[ritannica] 10:9

****(or do I mean A~64?!)

– Let this notation evolve!)

#(But then, if this G~ period shows less of (its own internal) patterns, why are females so much more subject to (externally imposed) patterns than males? Or are they?)

#*See elsewhere in VII.... []

[continued]

[PostedBlogger29012022]