{Schumpeter K [, Kondratieff, & Juglar] Cycles [continued (3)]}[26th October 1989]

[Redbook6:334][19891026:1125e]{Schumpeter K [, Kondratieff, & Juglar] Cycles [continued (3)]}[26th October 1989]

19891026.1125

[continued]

I speculate (and only time will show whether the K-cycle is a 64-year period) that K is regularising sooner than J[uglar]* because we are seeing not only the end of a series of 8 K[-]cycles but also the end of a series of 8 512-year (super-K?) cycles, ie a 4096 year cycle. Obviously that means that any sub-cycle of [the] 4096-cycle (eg 128, 256, 1024, 2048), if relevant, is also drawing to a close, which implies a strong regularising tendency in any final cycle (eg the 512** year cycle containing all the 64-year K cycles examined).

On the other hand, the only complete series of 8 J-cycles is not the final series in this 4096-cycle*** so the effect might not be so apparent. If J-cycles no longer exist, we may never know!

****

*[See last two previous entries.]

**[ms has 536 (& see next entry), which must presumably be an error]

*** – only the 3^rd to last –

****Similarly, if K cycles are accepted, they will probably be ironed out of existence….

[continues]

[PostedBlogger04for03092020]