{Fictions renumbered (2)}[30th August 1989]

[Redbook6:223][19890830:1424c]{Fictions renumbered (2)}[30th August 1989]

19890830.1424

[continued]

I am becoming more* certain that the numbering of the three latest fictions should be:

[Text extracted from ms diagram partially reproduced above:]

	0
	C
II	|
/	|
–	+	–
\	|
	↓
	A~
	I

The titles [of] ‘[0]’ and ‘[1]’ are particularly appropriate for C (T[arot]0) and a~/A~ (TI) respectively. The title of ‘[2]’, which I have enjoyed but been slightly doubtful of, will have to be changed (along with the first part of each page-reference).[**]

The key archetype in [0] is undoubtedly +C, emerging; in [1], +Mk; and in the new [II], xS – in terms of the development of each book.**

*ref [[Redbook6:205][19890810:1227]{Fictions renumbered (1)}[10th August 1989],] 205 [→]

**{→ [[Redbook6:224][19890830:1424f]{Renaming ‘[2]’}[30th August 1989],] 224}

[PostedBlogger06for07032020]