{Gospel Circles (4) [continued (3)] [– John [continued (3)]]}[10th September 1989]

[Redbook6:231-232][19890910:2353c]{Gospel Circles (4) [continued (3)] [– John [continued (3)]]}[10th September 1989]

19890910.2353

[continued]

Another approach follows the clues given as to time of year in John’s Gospel:

[The ms diagram reproduced above is too complex to justify extraction of text into a table at present]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger31032020]

{Gospel Circles (4) [continued] [– John] [continued] }[10th September 1989]

[Redbook6:231][19890910:2353b]{Gospel Circles (4) [continued] [– John] [continued] }[10th September 1989]

19890910.2353

[continued]

There are also* 7 self-revelatory pronouncements:**

1.	Bread of life
2.	Light of the World
3.	Door of the sheepfold
4.	Good shepherd
5.	Resurrection and life
6.	Way, Truth and Life
7.	True vine

*[See last previous entry]

**[in the Gospel according to John]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger30032020]

{Gospel Circles (4) [– John]}[10th September 1989]

[Redbook6:231-233][19890910:2353]{Gospel Circles (4) [– John]}[10th September 1989]

19890910.2353

*John’s** miracles:***

[Text extracted from ms diagram reproduced above:]

					|
					c
		\			TXXI			/
Wedding water to wine			r~				s~			Raising of Lazarus
				TXIV		TXX				from [the] dead
Healing official’s son	–	g~	TXV		+		TXIX	m~	–	Cure of blind[-]
										from[-]birth
				TXVI		TXVIII
Healing paralytic			j~				u~			Walks on water
at pool at Bethesda		/			TXVII			\
where Angel stirs water					a~
					|

Feeding of the multitude

*{[[Redbook6:229-230][19890909:1148]{Gospel Circles (3) (a) Mark}[9th September 1989]ff,] 230 →}

**[ie from the Gospel according to John]

***per E[nyclopaedia] B[ritannica] 14:829

[continues]

[PostedBlogger29032020]

{Point of Accumulation}[9th September 1989]

[Redbook6:230][19890909:1801]{Point of Accumulation}[9th September 1989]

.1801

Ref* the ‘Point of Accumulation’ between A~ & J~ (from chaotic maths, where breakdown occurs) – the same point is reached coming the other way, between a~ and u~, making Evolution possible (even though a degree of Diversity has already occurred)

[Text extracted from ms diagram reproduced above:]

n=0

2n

|

c

1

\

0

/

r~

s~

1

–

g~

2

+

m~

–

2

3

j~

u~

/

4

\

a~

3

|

4

DISTRACTION

– but in this direction the quality is quite different, being a cycle of integration.

*Vol IV? [[Redbook4:135-136][19871019:0925d]{Angelic Hierarchies [continued (7): Virtues and Powers (and Principalities]}[19th October 1987] – this seems to be the only mention in that volume]

{/V? [[Redbook5:248-262][19880803:1017b]{Chaotic Determinism (+ Extracts)}[3rd August 1988]ff, eg

[Redbook5:253-254][19880804:1354b]{Chaotic Determinism (+ Extracts) [continued (12)]}[4th August 1988]]}

[PostedBlogger28032020]

{Gospel Circles (3) [continued (4)]}[9th September 1989]

[Redbook6:230][19890909:1148d]{Gospel Circles (3) [continued (4)]}[9th September 1989]

.1148

[continued]

If the analysis of Mark’s Gospel* is valid (& if it** is the most authentic), the meaning seems to be that Jesus, having used an inner circle for the initiation of his Disciples and his mission (and that of the Church), then quite deliberately switched to an outer circle development in order to bring about his own death. The second half is noticeably more negative in tone than the first half.

*[See last previous entry but 2, [Redbook6:229-230][19890909:1148]{Gospel Circles (3) (a) Mark}[9th September 1989]]

**[Mark’s Gospel, presumably, not the analysis]

***{→ [[Redbook6:231-233][19890910:2353]{Gospel Circles (4)}[10th September 1989],] 231}

[PostedBlogger27032020]

{Gospel Circles (3) [continued (3)] (b) Matthew [continued]}[9th September 1989]

[Redbook6:229-230][19890909:1148c]{Gospel Circles (3) [continued (3)] (b) Matthew [continued]}[9th September 1989]

.1148

[continued]

It can be seen* that Matthew’s Gospel is distorted from the original pattern: use of the 7 sections, which apparently are found in the Greek Gospel, is neater:

[The ms diagram reproduced above is too complex to justify extraction of text into a table at present]

(There is a strong contra-rotation: both halves are left and right, inner and outer.)

The arrangement in Matthew, therefore, looks more formally contrived to fit a simple outer circle with some inner circle resonances: in accordance with the repeated pattern of 7 found throughout.

*ref above [last previous entry](?))

[Words up to semi-colon repeated from last previous entry, ts only]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger26032020]

{Gospel Circles (3) [continued] (b) Matthew}

[Redbook6:229][19890909:1148b]{Gospel Circles (3) [continued] (b) Matthew}[9th September 1989]

.1148

[continued]

MATTHEW’S GOSPEL – Transfiguration at turning point; divided by theme.

[The ms diagram reproduced above is too complex to justify extraction of text into a table at present]

It can be seen that Matthew’s Gospel is distorted from the original pattern [….]*

*[Continues in next entry, in which this part-sentence is repeated (ts only)]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger25032020]