{Spherical Orientation [continued (26)]: Correction}[18th August 1988]

[Redbook5:319-320][19880818:1810i]{Spherical Orientation [continued (26)]: Correction}[18th August 1988]

.1810

[continued]

(CORRECTION)*

Basically, what has happened** is that a model of relationships, using images and words, has become a little bit too much of a rule for the experience of Individuals – whether Angels or Men. It is the experience that counts – of Angels and Men.

The model was meant to be a model of development, not of space or spatial analogies. I believe that as a model of the relationship between the Physical Universe and the Spiritual Kingdom in terms of development, it is a good one, enabling one in theory to identify the developmental locations and movements of Individuals with moderate precision.

But no one can define spatially the link between where I sit now and what I see or am aware of in my head. As an analogy for that, the sphere and hemisphere model is crude and unrewarding. It is quite enough to say that a Free Spirit can move and be where he wills in the Outer and Inner Worlds, unaffected by the physical limitations imposed by the Universe, but subject always to the Will of God; | and that a Man can become aware of the Spiritual Kingdom as well as the Physical World.

*[of [Redbook5:313][19880818:1145n]{Spherical Orientation [continued (14)]}[18th August 1988] (2nd para) to 

[Redbook5:318-319][19880818:1810g]{Spherical Orientation [continued (24)]}[18th August 1988]]

**[See last previous entry]

[& see next entry]

[continues under separate heading]

[PostedBlogger27for28022019]