[Redbook5:248-249][19880803:1017c]{Chaotic
Determinism (+ Extracts) [continued]}[3rd
August 1988]
19880803.1017
[continued]
The
implication,* so far, is that the Circles analysis of human affairs,
particularly, may be more acceptable than it would have been even a
few years ago, to the extent that it can be linked with the new
mathematics of chaos. It seems clear that crucial features of the
construction
of the ‘chaotic’ Circle from a single point can
be so linked; it remains to be seen whether the operation
of the Circles in this analysis can also be linked in this way (the
Lorenzian Waterwheel and strange attractor are hopeful signs). BUT
I need to learn still [sic]
more maths, both conventional and new, to make sense of this in
mathematical terms.
*[of
Gleick, ‘Chaos, Making a New Science’, Heinemann, London, 1988;
see last previous entry]
[continues]
[PostedBlogger01112018]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.