{Chaotic Determinism (+ Extracts) [continued (10)]}[3rd August 1988]

[Redbook5:252-253][19880803:2317]{Chaotic Determinism (+ Extracts) [continued (10)]}[3rd August 1988]

.1117

*The colour photo of ‘the complex boundaries of Newton’s Method’,** with its diagonal boundaries (between cardinal colours) showing predominantly the colours of the non-adjacent cardinals [sic] mingling with those of the adjacent cardinals – and bordering, of course, in an irregular way, the adjacent cardinal colours’ main ‘blocs’. [sic] (I presume that the transition from darkness to lightness of the colours is relatively arbitrarily chosen – I hope so, anyway.)

This feature – the nature of the boundaries – can be applied to the Circle Diagonals to describe how – in practice, in [2] and when considering the degrees of T.II – T.VI*** – they seem to be heavily influenced by the two Cardinal Points which are opposite, as well as around them (and consider Rachel’s character [in [2]], owing much to xS’s attributes; I hadn’t seen much of xA in her, but then I hadn’t seen much of xA at all).

*Points of particular relevance to C[ircles] A[nalysis]. <880807>

**Ibid [Gleick, ‘Chaos, Making a New Science’, Heinemann, London, 1988], 172-3

[See [Redbook5:250][19880803:1949b]{Chaotic Determinism (+ Extracts) [continued (6)]}[3rd August 1988], esp fn:#]

***[T.VI should read T.V? See eg [Redbook5:191][19880620:1040h]{The Formative Circle}[20^th June 1988]]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger08for09112018]