{Synthesis - Analysis}[8th July 1988]

[Redbook5:208][19880708:1754]{Synthesis - Analysis}[8th July 1988]

19880708.1754

The *C17^th and C18^th Rationalist philosophers' Analysis – Synthesis method** is the opposite of mine, which follows the Inner Circle correctly:

[Text from diagram above:]

		C~
	/ –		←\
G~	SYNTHESIS [↓]	+	[↑] ANALYSIS	M~
	\→		→/
		A~

The comparison does not look so good on circles 1 and 3:*** the implication is that Analysis should not overrule Synthesis, but should guide it within an awareness of Analysis' own limitations.****

*[C = Century]

**ref [[Redbook5:170][19880618:0000]{Analysis and Synthesis}[18^th June 1988],] 170

(& [[Redbook5:191-193][19880620:1040i]{Horizontal Contra-Rotation}[20^th June 1988],] 192)

***ref [[Redbook5:170][19880618:0000]{Analysis and Synthesis}[18^th June 1988],] 170

****That's what I would like it to be [sic], anyway <880717>

#In fact the final circle on [[[Redbook5:170][19880618:0000]{Analysis and Synthesis}[18^th June 1988],] ] p170 is the most useful. <891010>

[PostedBlogger25082018]