[Redbook9:33-34][19910402:1300d]{Computerisation of C[ircles] A[nalysis &] S[ynthesis]? (3) [continued (3)]}[2nd April 1991]
19910402.1300
[continued]
Problems which are likely in practice using unmodified historical data (– modification might consist eg in separating out events relating to a larger timescale, although it is debatable whether this is justifiable for events which can be identified within a year):–
eg
(1) Because G~ and M~ events are more clearly identifiable (especially M~) than A~ and C, the closed curve* will be flattened and will probably bulge towards M~ (like an egg on its side?).
(2) The netting off of G~ and M~ values against each other, and of A~ and C values, may give a misleading impression, although it is difficult to see how else to do it. In this case, a position at ‘O’ implies balance of external values** rather than some type of internal spiritual ‘O’ value: we are dealing with Outer Circle values, not with the Inner Circle, to which I doubt whether these methods would apply.
(Inner Circle degrees may still be inferred by qualitative judgement, but that is something other. The major difference, I think, is that Outer Circle rotation is is analytical or disintegrative and discards previous values whereas the Inner Circle is synthetical or integrative and therefore accumulates values.)
It might be wiser therefore*** to use the extra column numbers, made available by grouping Nation States into territories,**** to provide a column for each of the 4 cardinal values for each territory, and only net them off as ‘x’ and ‘y’ when required. There again, these might be required for any Territory – not just for groups of territories# – so perhaps not.
*[See last previous ts entry but one]
**whether equally neutral (zero), ‘normal’ (one) or extreme (eg 4).
[See eg [Redbook9:(30-)31][19910401:1205e]{Computerisation of C[ircles] A[nalysis &] S[ynthesis]? (2) [continued (10)]}[1st April 1991]]
***(re problem 2↑)
****[See [Redbook9:27-29][19910401:1205]{Computerisation of C[ircles] A[nalysis &] S[ynthesis]? (2) [continued (6)]}[1st April 1991]]
#[sic]
[continued]
[PostedBlogger01042024]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.