{Computerisation of C[ircles] A[nalysis &] S[ynthesis]? (1) [continued]}[27th March 1991]

[Redbook9:13][19910327:1845b]{Computerisation of C[ircles] A[nalysis &] S[ynthesis]? (1) [continued]}[27th March 1991]

.1845

[continued]

I badly need a system of symbols to identify different types of event or interaction. The types required only become clear as one works on the chart, and even then are further complicated by scaling – by the way differences in scale can change the type of an interaction (eg inter-national [sic] war becomes regional ‘civil’ war on a wider geographical, and probably a longer chronological, scale).*

My first idea is to use symbols of this sort:

>	attacks
<	is attacked by
>|	attacks unsuccessfully
|<	is attacked by unsuccessfully
^	revolts [...]
_
^	[revolts] unsuccessfully**
etc.

*{But see below [↓]}

**[In the ms the horizontal line touches the top of the in-line circumflex mark]

[continued]

[PostedBlogger28022024]